Issue of illegal immigration divides Republicans heading into `06 elections


Gilchrist for Congress
PO Box 295
Lake Forest, CA 92609

Endorsed by:











Knight Ridder Newspapers
Issue of illegal immigration divides Republicans heading into `06 elections
By Steven Thomma

December 7, 2005

WASHINGTON Jim Gilchrist lost his bid for Congress this week. But as the founder of the "Minutemen" border patrol, he won a bigger personal victory by sending a signal that immigration will be a major divisive issue in next year's congressional elections.

A growing chorus of Republicans like Gilchrist wants to throw illegal immigrants out of the country and seal the border behind them. They're being urged on by talk radio and conservative activists with the same fervor that led the government to intervene last spring in the case of Terri Schiavo, a brain-damaged Florida woman.

But just as in the Schiavo case, appealing to the Republican Party's social-conservative wing on illegal immigrants could invite a backlash, this time from Hispanics. Cracking down also risks splitting vital parts of the party's base.

"This puts them in a tough spot," said R. Michael Alvarez, a political scientist at the California Institute of Technology. "They're torn in at least three directions. They need to appeal to the business side of the party that needs the immigrant labor. They need to appeal to the conservative base. And they need to appeal to Latinos and Hispanics."

Already an icon to Americans who are fed up with illegal immigration, Gilchrist ran for an open seat in the House of Representatives on the single issue of getting tough on illegal immigration. Despite running as a third-party candidate, he managed to win 25 percent of the vote in a district dominated by regular Republicans.

"The Gilchrist vote ought to be an early warning of the level of voter anger out there about illegal immigration," said Dan Schnur, a Republican strategist in California. "That a third-party candidate drew 25 percent of the vote tells us this is an issue that reaches voters at a very visceral level."

It's likely to embolden like-minded Republicans, such as Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., who's pushing legislation to crack down on illegal immigrants and is weighing a run for his party's 2008 presidential nomination.

Tancredo spokesman Will Adams said the message of the Gilchrist vote was that the Republican conservative base was adamant about immigration and would reward those who were tough on the issue and punish those seen as weak.

"Conservative Republicans won't stomach someone who is squishy on immigration," Adams said.

He said pressure from conservatives recently forced President Bush to ratchet up his rhetoric about sealing the border, but that they remained skeptical about his call for a guest-worker program that would let illegals remain in the country. "He's been brought to his knees on rhetoric," Adams said. "We're not so sure the policy will follow."

Some Republicans, including Bush, want to try to reach all sides, pushing for better security at the border and terms to allow illegals to keep working here, at least temporarily.

Bush adviser Ken Mehlman, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, recently cautioned his party against appearing anti-immigrant, particularly as he works to expand Republican support among Hispanics, the country's fastest-growing minority.

But many Republicans dismiss out of hand proposals for "guest worker" programs that would allow those who are already here to stay.

One Republican proposal would require illegal immigrants to return home and apply from there for jobs in the United States. They then could obtain temporary visas, but couldn't win U.S. citizenship.

Another proposal would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny citizenship to children who are born in the United States to parents who aren't citizens or permanent resident aliens. That bill has 77 co-sponsors in the House, despite the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, passed in 1868, which grants citizenship to anyone who's born here.

Democrats are waiting in the wings, eager to take advantage.

At a recent Democratic National Committee meeting in Arizona, party Chairman Howard Dean said Republicans would attack illegal immigrants in 2006 as they attacked gay marriage in 2004, to satisfy their base. "They divided us shamefully in 2004," Dean said. "In 2006, it's going to be immigrants. That's who (they're) going to scapegoat next."

The Democrats condemned the Minutemen and "vigilante groups" that they said had created fear, immigrant scapegoats and xenophobia.

The DNC lambasted a proposed Colorado state constitutional amendment that would restrict nonemergency government services to citizens and legal aliens. They said the amendment would force state and local agencies to verify citizenship and would discourage residents from calling 911 for ambulances, for help in domestic disputes or to volunteer information to police. They also said it would require doctors and nurses "to waste precious time" checking birth certificates and passports instead of providing medical care.

Dean did stress that "we need to be tough on immigration; we need to enforce our border laws." And the Democratic governors of New Mexico and Arizona have declared official "states of emergency" over the illegal immigrants flooding into their states.

But the DNC offered only one concrete suggestion, urging that "enforcement of our immigration laws is not targeted solely at undocumented workers, but that it also addresses the employers who recruit and hire them."


Paid for and authorized by Gilchrist for Congress